Hamilton, Leclerc, and Gasly lose positions due to technical irregularities

Team Statement pic.twitter.com/BdV24Y3cFV

— Scuderia Ferrari HP (@ScuderiaFerrari) March 23, 2025

Weight below the limit knocks Leclerc and Gasly out

Charles Leclerc, who crossed the finish line in fifth place, and Pierre Gasly, who came in 11th, were disqualified for a similar infraction: their cars weighed less than the minimum required. Under Formula 1 rules, cars must maintain a minimum weight of 800 kilograms, including the driver and equipment, at all times during the race. Post-race checks initially showed compliance, but after draining the fuel—a standard procedure—both vehicles registered at 799 kilograms.

Though a difference of just one kilogram might seem negligible, the regulations are unequivocal: the minimum weight must be consistently met. In Leclerc’s case, Ferrari acknowledged the mistake during the stewards’ hearing, describing it as a genuine error. Alpine, Gasly’s team, also did not dispute the FIA’s measurements, which were deemed accurate and conducted per protocol. With no mitigating circumstances presented, the penalty was unavoidable, costing Leclerc a valuable top-5 finish and Gasly a shot at points.

Weight-related issues are not new to Formula 1. The rule exists to ensure fairness among teams and prevent competitive advantages, but the rigorous post-race scrutiny often catches teams off guard. The disqualifications of Leclerc and Gasly emphasize the need for absolute precision in technical management, particularly in a sport where every detail can determine success or failure.

• Leclerc’s infraction: car at 799 kg after fuel removal.
• Gasly’s infraction: same weight recorded, below the 800 kg minimum.
• Impact: loss of points in the drivers’ and constructors’ championships.

Hamilton penalized for non-compliant floor

Unlike Leclerc and Gasly, Lewis Hamilton’s disqualification stemmed from a dimensional irregularity in his car. The seven-time champion, who finished sixth, had his result nullified due to an issue with the floor of his Ferrari. Post-race measurements revealed that the thickness of the car’s skid block was below the minimum 9 millimeters mandated by the technical regulations.

The readings showed 8.6 mm on the left and center of the car, and 8.5 mm on the right side. The wear, likely caused by scraping against the track, was enough to breach Article 3.5.9 of the rules. Such infractions are not uncommon on demanding circuits like Shanghai, where abrasive asphalt and high-speed corners push cars to their limits. Nevertheless, it falls on the team to ensure compliance, and Ferrari offered no counterarguments to challenge the ruling.

Hamilton, aiming to solidify his transition to Ferrari, was let down by a technical oversight beyond his control. The disqualification marks a rocky start for the Briton with the Italian team, which had hoped to leverage the Chinese GP to boost his championship standing. The loss of points also hampers Ferrari’s efforts in the constructors’ battle, where every result is vital to closing the gap with rivals like McLaren and Red Bull.

Immediate effects on the Chinese GP standings

The disqualifications of Hamilton, Leclerc, and Gasly significantly altered the final standings of the Chinese GP. Oscar Piastri held onto his victory, leading McLaren’s one-two finish with Lando Norris, but the top 10 welcomed new faces. Lance Stroll of Aston Martin, originally 12th, rose to ninth, while Carlos Sainz of Williams climbed from 13th to 10th, securing crucial points for his team.

George Russell of Mercedes completed the podium in third, followed by Max Verstappen of Red Bull in fourth. Esteban Ocon and Oliver Bearman, both from Haas, also benefited, finishing fifth and eighth, respectively. Kimi Antonelli, a rising star at Mercedes, took sixth, while Alexander Albon of Williams secured seventh. The reshuffled order highlights the competitiveness of the midfield, where teams like Haas and Williams seized the chance to score.

Here’s the adjusted classification post-penalties:

• 1st Oscar Piastri (McLaren) – 1:30:55.026
• 2nd Lando Norris (McLaren) – +9s748
• 3rd George Russell (Mercedes) – +11s097
• 4th Max Verstappen (Red Bull) – +16s656
• 5th Esteban Ocon (Haas) – +49s969
• 6th Kimi Antonelli (Mercedes) – +53s748
• 7th Alexander Albon (Williams) – +56s321
• 8th Oliver Bearman (Haas) – +1m01s303
• 9th Lance Stroll (Aston Martin) – +1m10s204
• 10th Carlos Sainz (Williams) – +1m16s387

Repercussions for Ferrari and Alpine in the championship

Ferrari suffered a double blow at the Chinese GP. Beyond failing to place its drivers on the podium during the race, the disqualifications of Hamilton and Leclerc compounded the team’s woes in the constructors’ championship. The Scuderia, already struggling for consistency this season, lost vital points that could prove decisive in its fight against McLaren and Red Bull. The technical blunder exposed weaknesses in car preparation, an area the Italian outfit must address swiftly to prevent further setbacks.

For Alpine, Pierre Gasly’s disqualification adds to a challenging year. The French team, aiming to climb the midfield ranks, saw a potential points finish slip away due to an avoidable mistake. Gasly, who was just seconds shy of the top 10, expressed disappointment, though the onus falls on the engineers who failed to ensure the car’s compliance. The lost points could hinder Alpine’s aspirations to rise in the standings.

Both teams now face the task of regrouping for upcoming races to recover lost ground. With the Formula 1 calendar progressing rapidly, each event offers a chance for redemption but also tests the teams’ ability to adapt and maintain technical accuracy.

A history of disqualifications in Formula 1

Technical irregularities are not uncommon in Formula 1 history. Over the years, several teams have faced penalties similar to those imposed at the Chinese GP. In 1994, Michael Schumacher was disqualified from the Belgian GP due to excessive wear on his Benetton’s floor, mirroring Hamilton’s case. More recently, in 2019, Racing Point lost points in the Canadian GP over brake system issues with Lance Stroll’s car.

These incidents illustrate the detailed and unforgiving nature of the sport’s technical regulations. The FIA enforces strict oversight to maintain a level playing field, placing constant pressure on teams. The infractions by Ferrari and Alpine at the Chinese GP show that even seasoned outfits can falter on basic requirements like weight and car dimensions.

• 1994: Schumacher loses Belgian win over irregular floor.
• 2019: Racing Point penalized in Canada for brake issues.
• 2023: Haas disqualified in the US for incorrect car height.

Timeline of investigations at the Chinese GP

The investigations leading to the disqualifications followed a standard FIA process. After the race concluded, the cars of Hamilton, Leclerc, and Gasly were selected for detailed inspection. The timeline unfolded as follows:

• 2:00 PM: Checkered flag waved at Shanghai circuit.
• 3:30 PM: Weighing and measuring of cars begins.
• 5:00 PM: Preliminary reports flag irregularities.
• 6:30 PM: Hearing with teams and stewards.
• 8:00 PM: Official announcement of disqualifications.

Led by technical delegate Joe Bauer, the process wrapped up in under six hours, showcasing the FIA’s efficiency in addressing breaches. The teams had the opportunity to defend their cases, but the lack of challenges to the measurements sealed the drivers’ fates.

What lies ahead in the season

With the Chinese GP in the books, Formula 1 gears up for the next round of the calendar. The affected teams have little time to refine their processes and prevent further errors. For Ferrari, the priority will be ensuring Hamilton and Leclerc’s cars fully comply with regulations, while Alpine aims to restore Gasly’s confidence and boost overall performance.

Meanwhile, McLaren celebrates a solid win, cementing its status as a dominant force this season. Red Bull, though not victorious, keeps Verstappen in contention for the drivers’ title. The balance between speed, strategy, and technical precision will remain the key differentiator in upcoming races, as each team battles to maximize points in a fiercely competitive field.

• Upcoming challenges: technical adjustments and track consistency.
• Standouts: McLaren on the rise, Ferrari under pressure.
• Focus: avoiding further penalties and reclaiming lost points.