Breaking
23 Apr 2025, Wed

players call it “insanity” and “blasphemy” in 2025

Lakers Luka Doncic


The trade that sent Luka Doncic from the Dallas Mavericks to the Los Angeles Lakers in February 2025 remains a lightning rod for debate in the basketball world. The unexpected deal saw Anthony Davis, Max Christie, and a 2029 first-round draft pick head to Dallas, while Doncic, Maxi Kleber, and Markieff Morris moved to Los Angeles. Nearly three months later, the decision continues to fuel heated discussions among players, fans, and analysts. An anonymous survey of approximately 150 NBA players from all 30 teams revealed a mix of shock, sharp criticism, and occasional praise for what is considered one of the most impactful trades in recent league history.

The trade’s effects were immediate. Doncic, then 25, was the face of the Mavericks, having led the team to the NBA Finals the previous season. His departure stunned the basketball community, especially given the lack of prior rumors. In Los Angeles, he quickly established himself as the Lakers’ centerpiece, helping the team secure the third seed in the Western Conference with a 50-32 record. Meanwhile, the Mavericks struggled, posting a 13-20 record after the trade, slipping to tenth in the West, and falling to the Memphis Grizzlies in the play-in tournament.

Players surveyed expressed a range of reactions, with many questioning Dallas’ decision to part with a generational talent for an older star, even one as accomplished as Davis. Others, however, saw merit in the move, praising the Mavericks’ focus on defense and the Lakers’ acquisition of a future cornerstone. Below is a detailed look at the reactions, impacts, and fallout from this game-changing trade.

Explosive reactions: what players think

The survey of NBA players uncovered a wide array of opinions on the trade. The majority voiced disbelief and disapproval of the Mavericks’ decision. One player called it “probably the worst decision in modern basketball history,” while another labeled it “blasphemy.” The perception that Doncic, at 25, represents the league’s future fueled much of the criticism. “Terrible trade. Keep Luka. He’s a generational player,” one athlete said, reflecting the sentiment that Dallas surrendered an irreplaceable asset.

Another point of contention was the lack of additional compensation in the deal. A player noted that trading someone of Doncic’s caliber should have netted Dallas “a series of first-round picks,” which didn’t happen. The trade, he argued, seemed lopsided, even with Davis’ status as one of the NBA’s top 75 players of all time. “If Luka can be traded, anyone can. It messed up how the NBA runs the league,” another player said, highlighting the trade’s broader implications for the market.

Yet, some players supported the trade, seeing benefits for both teams. “I think it was a good trade for both sides. Los Angeles got better with Doncic, and Anthony Davis will fit perfectly in Dallas,” one athlete opined. Another praised Dallas’ defensive strategy: “They wanted someone to play both ends of the floor.” Despite these positive takes, they were in the minority, with most comments reflecting shock and criticism of Dallas’ choice.

  • Key criticisms of the trade:
  • “Insanity. The trade made no sense. I don’t know how to make sense of it.”
  • “The dumbest idea of all time.”
  • “Shocking. Surprising. I still don’t understand how it happened.”
  • “Stupid. Dallas’ decision? Stupid. Lakers’ decision? Great.”

Immediate impact on Lakers and Mavericks

Luka Doncic’s arrival transformed the Lakers into a title contender in 2025. In 28 regular-season games with the team, the Slovenian averaged 28.2 points, 8.1 rebounds, and 7.5 assists per game, numbers nearly identical to his Dallas stats. His ability to lead the offense, paired with LeBron James’ experience and Austin Reaves’ versatility, elevated the team’s performance. In the first round of the playoffs, the Lakers face the Minnesota Timberwolves, with the series tied 1-1 after a 94-85 win in Game 2.

Doncic also brought tactical advantages. His experience against the Timberwolves in the previous season, when he led Dallas to a 4-1 win in the Western Conference Finals, has informed the Lakers’ playoff strategy under coach JJ Redick. In that series, Doncic averaged 32.4 points, 9.6 rebounds, 8.2 assists, and 2.2 steals, showcasing his ability to dominate in high-stakes moments.

In contrast, the Mavericks faced turmoil post-trade. Anthony Davis, despite his elite status, was limited to nine regular-season games due to an adductor injury. The team also suffered from other injuries, including Kyrie Irving’s torn ACL in March and nagging issues for Dereck Lively II, Daniel Gafford, and Caleb Martin. Without Doncic to offset these absences, Dallas struggled offensively, ranking 24th in defensive efficiency since the trade.

The logic behind Dallas’ decision

Nico Harrison, the Mavericks’ general manager, defended the trade as a move to bolster defense and pursue immediate success. “Defense wins championships,” Harrison repeatedly stated, emphasizing Davis’ All-NBA and All-Defensive credentials as a perfect complement to Kyrie Irving, Klay Thompson, PJ Washington, and Dereck Lively II. The goal was to build a balanced roster capable of competing at the highest level on both ends of the floor.

However, injuries and fan backlash derailed the plan. Harrison admitted he underestimated the fans’ attachment to Doncic, who was not just the team’s star but a beloved figure in Dallas. During Doncic’s return game at American Airlines Center on April 9, fans chanted “Fire Nico” and displayed protest signs. The Mavericks’ 112-97 loss, with Doncic scoring 45 points, amplified the criticism.

The trade also carried significant financial consequences. Estimates suggest Dallas could lose hundreds of millions in revenue over the next few years due to declining ticket sales, merchandise, and sponsorships. This season alone, the franchise has seen a revenue drop of “tens of millions,” with smaller crowds and sponsors pulling back.

  • Factors influencing the trade:
  • Defensive focus: Harrison believed Davis would provide a greater defensive impact than Doncic.
  • Competitive window: Dallas aimed to maximize title chances within five years, rather than a decade with Doncic.
  • Unexpected injuries: Davis and Irving’s absences derailed the plan.
  • Fan reaction: The front office underestimated the fans’ devotion to Doncic.

Fan outrage and emotional toll

Doncic’s return to Dallas on April 9 was an emotionally charged event. Before the game, the Mavericks played a tribute video, with fans’ seats adorned with shirts reading “Hvala za vse” (Thank you for everything) in Slovenian. Doncic, visibly moved, wiped away tears during the ceremony. “After that video, I didn’t think I’d be able to play,” he admitted post-game, where he scored 45 points to lead the Lakers to victory.

Fans showed a mix of affection for Doncic and frustration with the front office. While cheering their former star, many booed Nico Harrison and voiced discontent over the trade. The presence of legends like Dirk Nowitzki and Mark Cuban, with Cuban wearing a Davis jersey, did little to ease tensions. Doncic’s relationship with Harrison also appears fractured, with the player stating he hasn’t spoken to the GM since the trade.

The trade’s cultural impact was notable. In Los Angeles, a local artist painted a mural honoring Doncic, reflecting his quick embrace by Lakers fans. In Dallas, his departure left a void, with fans questioning the franchise’s direction. Some compared Harrison’s decision to the Golden State Warriors’ trade of Monta Ellis in 2012, but the fallout in Dallas feels far more profound.

On-court performance: who won the trade?

Evaluating the trade’s success involves weighing immediate results and long-term prospects. For the Lakers, acquiring Doncic was a strategic coup to secure a leader for the next decade, especially with LeBron James’ retirement looming. The trio of Doncic, James, and Reaves has produced an efficient offense, averaging 119.5 points per 100 possessions, among the league’s best.

In the playoffs, Doncic has already proven his worth. In Game 2 against the Timberwolves, he scored 28 points, grabbed 7 rebounds, and dished 6 assists, helping tie the series. His playmaking and clutch scoring have been vital, positioning the Lakers as title contenders if they stay healthy.

For the Mavericks, the outlook is grim. Despite Davis’ elite talent, evidenced by a 40-point performance in one of his few full games, injuries and a lack of offensive creation hampered the team. Their play-in loss to the Grizzlies, 120-106, capped a disappointing season. Doncic’s absence, which could have mitigated the injuries, was keenly felt in critical moments.

The future for both franchises

Looking ahead, the Lakers appear better positioned. With Doncic under contract for two more years and eligible for an extension, the franchise has a foundation for sustained success. Financial flexibility and available draft picks allow GM Rob Pelinka to tweak the roster, strengthening the team for the 2026 playoffs and beyond.

The Mavericks face a murkier path. Anthony Davis’ health will be pivotal for next season, but the loss of draft picks from 2027 to 2030 limits rebuilding options. Nico Harrison, with three years left on his contract, is banking on Davis’ recovery and a more defensive-minded roster, but fan pressure and subpar results threaten his tenure.

The trade also raises broader questions about the NBA market. Trading a young star like Doncic, absent clear signs of discontent, may embolden other teams to make bold moves. For some players, the trade suggests “no one is safe,” reshaping the dynamics of player-team loyalty.

  • Outlook for 2025-2026:
  • Lakers: Solidify Doncic as the franchise leader and pursue roster upgrades.
  • Mavericks: Rely on Davis’ health and find a replacement for Doncic’s offensive creation.
  • NBA: Monitor the impact of high-stakes trades on market dynamics and player relations.

Timeline of the trade and its fallout

The Doncic-Davis trade marked a turning point in the 2024-2025 NBA season. Below is a chronology of key events:

  • February 1, 2025: Mavericks and Lakers announce the trade, sending Doncic, Kleber, and Morris to Los Angeles for Davis, Christie, and a 2029 first-round pick.
  • April 9, 2025: Doncic returns to Dallas as a Laker, scoring 45 points in a 112-97 win. Fans protest against Nico Harrison.
  • April 15, 2025: Mavericks are eliminated in the play-in by the Grizzlies, ending their season.
  • April 18, 2025: Doncic reveals he broke his phone upon learning of the trade, expressing shock and sadness.
  • April 21sheviks April 21, 2025: Harrison admits he underestimated Doncic’s impact on fans.
  • April 23, 2025: Lakers tie their playoff series against the Timberwolves, led by Doncic.

Legacy of a controversial decision

The Luka Doncic-Anthony Davis trade has already cemented its place as one of the NBA’s most polarizing moves. For the Lakers, acquiring a young, transcendent talent like Doncic offers a chance to build a lasting legacy, particularly as LeBron James nears retirement. The team has capitalized on the Slovenian’s versatility and leadership, with fans quickly embracing him as the face of the franchise’s new era.

In Dallas, the trade has left deep scars. The early play-in exit, coupled with injuries and fan unrest, has put Nico Harrison under intense scrutiny. Betting on Anthony Davis, while grounded in defensive logic, has yet to yield results, and Doncic’s absence exposed the roster’s flaws. The decision to prioritize a short-term title window over a long-term vision with Doncic will be judged in the years ahead.

The player survey captures the trade’s impact on the basketball zeitgeist. Terms like “insanity,” “blasphemy,” and “phenomenal” reflect the polarized reactions. While some view the trade as a historic blunder, others believe time may vindicate Dallas’ gamble. For now, the Lakers are reaping immediate rewards, but the final verdict hinges on both teams’ future performance.

The trade also serves as a cautionary tale for other franchises. Trading a young, established star like Doncic, without clear signs of discontent, could inspire similar high-risk moves. For fans, it’s a reminder that in modern basketball, loyalty and tradition often give way to strategic calculations and short-term ambitions.

  • Trade tidbits:
  • Doncic was so shocked by the trade news that he threw his phone, cracking the screen, though it still works.
  • A Los Angeles mural was painted to honor Doncic, reflecting his swift acceptance by Lakers fans.
  • The trade draws comparisons to the Warriors’ 2012 Monta Ellis deal, but with far greater financial and emotional fallout.
  • Dallas faces an estimated $100 million revenue loss due to Doncic’s departure.



The trade that sent Luka Doncic from the Dallas Mavericks to the Los Angeles Lakers in February 2025 remains a lightning rod for debate in the basketball world. The unexpected deal saw Anthony Davis, Max Christie, and a 2029 first-round draft pick head to Dallas, while Doncic, Maxi Kleber, and Markieff Morris moved to Los Angeles. Nearly three months later, the decision continues to fuel heated discussions among players, fans, and analysts. An anonymous survey of approximately 150 NBA players from all 30 teams revealed a mix of shock, sharp criticism, and occasional praise for what is considered one of the most impactful trades in recent league history.

The trade’s effects were immediate. Doncic, then 25, was the face of the Mavericks, having led the team to the NBA Finals the previous season. His departure stunned the basketball community, especially given the lack of prior rumors. In Los Angeles, he quickly established himself as the Lakers’ centerpiece, helping the team secure the third seed in the Western Conference with a 50-32 record. Meanwhile, the Mavericks struggled, posting a 13-20 record after the trade, slipping to tenth in the West, and falling to the Memphis Grizzlies in the play-in tournament.

Players surveyed expressed a range of reactions, with many questioning Dallas’ decision to part with a generational talent for an older star, even one as accomplished as Davis. Others, however, saw merit in the move, praising the Mavericks’ focus on defense and the Lakers’ acquisition of a future cornerstone. Below is a detailed look at the reactions, impacts, and fallout from this game-changing trade.

Explosive reactions: what players think

The survey of NBA players uncovered a wide array of opinions on the trade. The majority voiced disbelief and disapproval of the Mavericks’ decision. One player called it “probably the worst decision in modern basketball history,” while another labeled it “blasphemy.” The perception that Doncic, at 25, represents the league’s future fueled much of the criticism. “Terrible trade. Keep Luka. He’s a generational player,” one athlete said, reflecting the sentiment that Dallas surrendered an irreplaceable asset.

Another point of contention was the lack of additional compensation in the deal. A player noted that trading someone of Doncic’s caliber should have netted Dallas “a series of first-round picks,” which didn’t happen. The trade, he argued, seemed lopsided, even with Davis’ status as one of the NBA’s top 75 players of all time. “If Luka can be traded, anyone can. It messed up how the NBA runs the league,” another player said, highlighting the trade’s broader implications for the market.

Yet, some players supported the trade, seeing benefits for both teams. “I think it was a good trade for both sides. Los Angeles got better with Doncic, and Anthony Davis will fit perfectly in Dallas,” one athlete opined. Another praised Dallas’ defensive strategy: “They wanted someone to play both ends of the floor.” Despite these positive takes, they were in the minority, with most comments reflecting shock and criticism of Dallas’ choice.

  • Key criticisms of the trade:
  • “Insanity. The trade made no sense. I don’t know how to make sense of it.”
  • “The dumbest idea of all time.”
  • “Shocking. Surprising. I still don’t understand how it happened.”
  • “Stupid. Dallas’ decision? Stupid. Lakers’ decision? Great.”

Immediate impact on Lakers and Mavericks

Luka Doncic’s arrival transformed the Lakers into a title contender in 2025. In 28 regular-season games with the team, the Slovenian averaged 28.2 points, 8.1 rebounds, and 7.5 assists per game, numbers nearly identical to his Dallas stats. His ability to lead the offense, paired with LeBron James’ experience and Austin Reaves’ versatility, elevated the team’s performance. In the first round of the playoffs, the Lakers face the Minnesota Timberwolves, with the series tied 1-1 after a 94-85 win in Game 2.

Doncic also brought tactical advantages. His experience against the Timberwolves in the previous season, when he led Dallas to a 4-1 win in the Western Conference Finals, has informed the Lakers’ playoff strategy under coach JJ Redick. In that series, Doncic averaged 32.4 points, 9.6 rebounds, 8.2 assists, and 2.2 steals, showcasing his ability to dominate in high-stakes moments.

In contrast, the Mavericks faced turmoil post-trade. Anthony Davis, despite his elite status, was limited to nine regular-season games due to an adductor injury. The team also suffered from other injuries, including Kyrie Irving’s torn ACL in March and nagging issues for Dereck Lively II, Daniel Gafford, and Caleb Martin. Without Doncic to offset these absences, Dallas struggled offensively, ranking 24th in defensive efficiency since the trade.

The logic behind Dallas’ decision

Nico Harrison, the Mavericks’ general manager, defended the trade as a move to bolster defense and pursue immediate success. “Defense wins championships,” Harrison repeatedly stated, emphasizing Davis’ All-NBA and All-Defensive credentials as a perfect complement to Kyrie Irving, Klay Thompson, PJ Washington, and Dereck Lively II. The goal was to build a balanced roster capable of competing at the highest level on both ends of the floor.

However, injuries and fan backlash derailed the plan. Harrison admitted he underestimated the fans’ attachment to Doncic, who was not just the team’s star but a beloved figure in Dallas. During Doncic’s return game at American Airlines Center on April 9, fans chanted “Fire Nico” and displayed protest signs. The Mavericks’ 112-97 loss, with Doncic scoring 45 points, amplified the criticism.

The trade also carried significant financial consequences. Estimates suggest Dallas could lose hundreds of millions in revenue over the next few years due to declining ticket sales, merchandise, and sponsorships. This season alone, the franchise has seen a revenue drop of “tens of millions,” with smaller crowds and sponsors pulling back.

  • Factors influencing the trade:
  • Defensive focus: Harrison believed Davis would provide a greater defensive impact than Doncic.
  • Competitive window: Dallas aimed to maximize title chances within five years, rather than a decade with Doncic.
  • Unexpected injuries: Davis and Irving’s absences derailed the plan.
  • Fan reaction: The front office underestimated the fans’ devotion to Doncic.

Fan outrage and emotional toll

Doncic’s return to Dallas on April 9 was an emotionally charged event. Before the game, the Mavericks played a tribute video, with fans’ seats adorned with shirts reading “Hvala za vse” (Thank you for everything) in Slovenian. Doncic, visibly moved, wiped away tears during the ceremony. “After that video, I didn’t think I’d be able to play,” he admitted post-game, where he scored 45 points to lead the Lakers to victory.

Fans showed a mix of affection for Doncic and frustration with the front office. While cheering their former star, many booed Nico Harrison and voiced discontent over the trade. The presence of legends like Dirk Nowitzki and Mark Cuban, with Cuban wearing a Davis jersey, did little to ease tensions. Doncic’s relationship with Harrison also appears fractured, with the player stating he hasn’t spoken to the GM since the trade.

The trade’s cultural impact was notable. In Los Angeles, a local artist painted a mural honoring Doncic, reflecting his quick embrace by Lakers fans. In Dallas, his departure left a void, with fans questioning the franchise’s direction. Some compared Harrison’s decision to the Golden State Warriors’ trade of Monta Ellis in 2012, but the fallout in Dallas feels far more profound.

On-court performance: who won the trade?

Evaluating the trade’s success involves weighing immediate results and long-term prospects. For the Lakers, acquiring Doncic was a strategic coup to secure a leader for the next decade, especially with LeBron James’ retirement looming. The trio of Doncic, James, and Reaves has produced an efficient offense, averaging 119.5 points per 100 possessions, among the league’s best.

In the playoffs, Doncic has already proven his worth. In Game 2 against the Timberwolves, he scored 28 points, grabbed 7 rebounds, and dished 6 assists, helping tie the series. His playmaking and clutch scoring have been vital, positioning the Lakers as title contenders if they stay healthy.

For the Mavericks, the outlook is grim. Despite Davis’ elite talent, evidenced by a 40-point performance in one of his few full games, injuries and a lack of offensive creation hampered the team. Their play-in loss to the Grizzlies, 120-106, capped a disappointing season. Doncic’s absence, which could have mitigated the injuries, was keenly felt in critical moments.

The future for both franchises

Looking ahead, the Lakers appear better positioned. With Doncic under contract for two more years and eligible for an extension, the franchise has a foundation for sustained success. Financial flexibility and available draft picks allow GM Rob Pelinka to tweak the roster, strengthening the team for the 2026 playoffs and beyond.

The Mavericks face a murkier path. Anthony Davis’ health will be pivotal for next season, but the loss of draft picks from 2027 to 2030 limits rebuilding options. Nico Harrison, with three years left on his contract, is banking on Davis’ recovery and a more defensive-minded roster, but fan pressure and subpar results threaten his tenure.

The trade also raises broader questions about the NBA market. Trading a young star like Doncic, absent clear signs of discontent, may embolden other teams to make bold moves. For some players, the trade suggests “no one is safe,” reshaping the dynamics of player-team loyalty.

  • Outlook for 2025-2026:
  • Lakers: Solidify Doncic as the franchise leader and pursue roster upgrades.
  • Mavericks: Rely on Davis’ health and find a replacement for Doncic’s offensive creation.
  • NBA: Monitor the impact of high-stakes trades on market dynamics and player relations.

Timeline of the trade and its fallout

The Doncic-Davis trade marked a turning point in the 2024-2025 NBA season. Below is a chronology of key events:

  • February 1, 2025: Mavericks and Lakers announce the trade, sending Doncic, Kleber, and Morris to Los Angeles for Davis, Christie, and a 2029 first-round pick.
  • April 9, 2025: Doncic returns to Dallas as a Laker, scoring 45 points in a 112-97 win. Fans protest against Nico Harrison.
  • April 15, 2025: Mavericks are eliminated in the play-in by the Grizzlies, ending their season.
  • April 18, 2025: Doncic reveals he broke his phone upon learning of the trade, expressing shock and sadness.
  • April 21sheviks April 21, 2025: Harrison admits he underestimated Doncic’s impact on fans.
  • April 23, 2025: Lakers tie their playoff series against the Timberwolves, led by Doncic.

Legacy of a controversial decision

The Luka Doncic-Anthony Davis trade has already cemented its place as one of the NBA’s most polarizing moves. For the Lakers, acquiring a young, transcendent talent like Doncic offers a chance to build a lasting legacy, particularly as LeBron James nears retirement. The team has capitalized on the Slovenian’s versatility and leadership, with fans quickly embracing him as the face of the franchise’s new era.

In Dallas, the trade has left deep scars. The early play-in exit, coupled with injuries and fan unrest, has put Nico Harrison under intense scrutiny. Betting on Anthony Davis, while grounded in defensive logic, has yet to yield results, and Doncic’s absence exposed the roster’s flaws. The decision to prioritize a short-term title window over a long-term vision with Doncic will be judged in the years ahead.

The player survey captures the trade’s impact on the basketball zeitgeist. Terms like “insanity,” “blasphemy,” and “phenomenal” reflect the polarized reactions. While some view the trade as a historic blunder, others believe time may vindicate Dallas’ gamble. For now, the Lakers are reaping immediate rewards, but the final verdict hinges on both teams’ future performance.

The trade also serves as a cautionary tale for other franchises. Trading a young, established star like Doncic, without clear signs of discontent, could inspire similar high-risk moves. For fans, it’s a reminder that in modern basketball, loyalty and tradition often give way to strategic calculations and short-term ambitions.

  • Trade tidbits:
  • Doncic was so shocked by the trade news that he threw his phone, cracking the screen, though it still works.
  • A Los Angeles mural was painted to honor Doncic, reflecting his swift acceptance by Lakers fans.
  • The trade draws comparisons to the Warriors’ 2012 Monta Ellis deal, but with far greater financial and emotional fallout.
  • Dallas faces an estimated $100 million revenue loss due to Doncic’s departure.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *