By rikififi90 
The scientific community faces a new challenge with the resurgence of eugenics ideas promoting the false notion of genetic superiority among human groups. Genevieve L. Wojcik, an epidemiology professor at Johns Hopkins University, published an article in Nature warning about the growing influence of these pseudoscientific theories. According to the expert, the eugenics movement, which gained momentum in the late 19th century, is reemerging in political rhetoric and practices that could undermine scientific advances and the fight for a more equitable world. Eugenics, historically linked to discriminatory policies and even Nazism, advocates for “genetic improvement” of humanity through measures like encouraging reproduction among certain groups and restricting it among others deemed inferior.
Wojcik’s warning comes at a time when statements from public figures are reigniting dangerous debates. In the United States, former President Donald Trump commented on the presence of “bad genes” in the country, tying it to immigration. Such remarks echo past ideologies that justified racist and exclusionary policies. Additionally, Robert Kennedy Jr., the current Health Secretary, sparked controversy by suggesting that vaccines for Black children should differ from those for white children, based on alleged immunological differences. These ideas, Wojcik argues, lack scientific backing and reinforce myths about biological differences between races.
Science, however, is clear: there are no human races with defined biological boundaries. Genomic studies show that two humans, regardless of physical traits, share, on average, 99% of their genetic material. Phenotypic differences, such as skin or eye color, represent minimal DNA variations. This reality dismantles the foundation of eugenics, which relies on the belief in fixed and hierarchical racial categories. For Wojcik, using concepts like “race” in scientific research can even hinder medical progress by overlooking genetic diversity within population groups.
- Key points raised by Wojcik:
- Eugenics promotes pseudoscientific ideas that justify discrimination.
- Recent political statements in the U.S. reinforce racial myths.
- Genetic science debunks the existence of biologically distinct races.
- The resurgence of eugenics threatens global equality.
Dark history of eugenics
The eugenics movement is not new, but its history reveals the dangers of its application. In the late 19th century, eugenics gained popularity in countries like the United Kingdom and the United States, inspired by the ideas of Francis Galton, Charles Darwin’s cousin. Galton argued that artificial selection could “improve” the human species, much like it did with plants and animals. Initially presented as scientific, this view was soon adopted by governments and institutions to justify discriminatory policies. In the U.S., for instance, eugenics underpinned laws restricting immigration and promoting forced sterilization of those deemed “unfit.”
Between the 1900s and 1970s, the United States implemented sterilization programs that affected 60,000 to 70,000 people. In states like Virginia, these practices continued until 1979, disproportionately targeting ethnic minorities, people with disabilities, and the poor. The 1924 Immigration Act, known as the Johnson-Reed Act, was also influenced by eugenics ideas, limiting the entry of immigrants from countries deemed “undesirable.” These policies had lasting impacts, reinforcing social and racial inequalities that persist today.
Eugenics also found resonance elsewhere. In Nazi Germany, notions of racial superiority led to atrocities like the Holocaust, with the sterilization and extermination of millions. While the collapse of the Nazi regime discredited eugenics for decades, Wojcik warns that its revival in new forms, often disguised as science, poses a real threat. White nationalism, gaining traction in various countries, often relies on narratives that distort genetics to promote racial divisions.
Science versus pseudoscience
Wojcik’s critique of eugenics is grounded in robust scientific evidence. Modern genomics has revealed that genetic variability among humans is far greater than differences between supposed “races.” For example, two individuals of African descent may have genetic differences as significant as those between an African and a European. This genetic heterogeneity challenges the idea of fixed racial categories, which eugenics uses as its basis.
A practical example is research on hemoglobinopathies, genetic disorders affecting hemoglobin production. The prevalence of these conditions varies widely by region, regardless of racial categories. In India, beta-thalassemia affects over 8% of the population in certain areas, while in China, it is below 2.7%. If scientists classified all these individuals as “Asian,” they would overlook critical differences affecting diagnosis and treatment. Such generalizations, Wojcik argues, hinder precision medicine, which relies on detailed analysis of genetic diversity.
Moreover, science has debunked myths about immunological differences between racial groups. Robert Kennedy Jr.’s suggestion that Black children need different vaccines lacks support from immunological studies. Vaccines are designed to work universally on the human immune system, with adjustments only for factors like age or specific health conditions. Statements like Kennedy’s not only lack evidence but also fuel distrust in science and public health policies.
- Scientific facts debunking eugenics:
- Two human genomes are 99% identical, regardless of appearance.
- Genetic variability within an ethnic group can exceed that between groups.
- Genetic diseases vary more by region than by racial categories.
- No evidence supports significant immunological differences between races.
Social and political impacts
The resurgence of eugenics ideas extends beyond science, with profound political and social implications. In the U.S., rhetoric from figures like Trump, linking immigration to “bad genes,” reflects an attempt to legitimize exclusionary policies. These narratives gain traction in a polarized context, where white nationalism finds room to grow. Wojcik warns that without a firm response from the scientific community, these ideas risk becoming normalized, undermining decades of progress in the fight against inequality.
Globally, white nationalism is also on the rise. In Europe, far-right parties have gained strength, often promoting rhetoric that echoes past eugenics. These movements frequently misuse science, citing genetic studies out of context to justify minority exclusion. The manipulation of science for political ends is not new, but the ease of spreading information in the digital age amplifies its reach.
In Brazil, while the eugenics debate is less explicit, structural racism still reflects some of its historical consequences. Public health and education policies often overlook the specificities of Black and Indigenous populations, perpetuating inequalities. Science has a critical role in debunking these distortions, promoting evidence-based policies grounded in human genetic diversity.
Role of the scientific community
Responding to eugenics, Wojcik argues, requires active engagement from scientists. This involves not only debunking pseudoscientific theories but also educating the public about the complexity of human genetics. Scientific education is a powerful tool to combat misinformation, especially when public figures selectively use science to advance their agendas.
Scientists must also engage in public policy, ensuring genetic research promotes health and well-being for all, not division. Initiatives like the Human Genome Project, which mapped the species’ genetic diversity, exemplify how science can unite rather than divide. Additionally, universities and research institutions should promote diversity among researchers to ensure varied perspectives in scientific production.
Communication is another key aspect. Complex genetic concepts are often misunderstood by the public, creating space for eugenics narratives. Scientists need to invest in outreach strategies that make genetics accessible without oversimplifications that distort reality. Wojcik suggests universities create community extension programs, bringing scientific knowledge directly to populations most affected by misinformation.
- Actions proposed by Wojcik for scientists:
- Actively combat genetic misinformation.
- Engage in evidence-based public policies.
- Promote diversity in scientific research.
- Invest in accessible communication about genetics.
Threat of white nationalism
The rise of white nationalism is a major concern highlighted by Wojcik. This movement, gaining ground in countries like the U.S., Hungary, and Poland, often co-opts scientific concepts to justify its ideologies. Genetics, in particular, is an easy target, as the public often lacks understanding of its complexity. Statements like Trump’s about “bad genes” or Kennedy’s about differentiated vaccines exploit this confusion, creating narratives that seem scientific but fail under scrutiny.
In practice, white nationalism uses eugenics to promote policies that restrict minority rights. In the U.S., proposals to limit immigration or encourage certain groups’ birth rates reflect a modern eugenics mindset. These policies not only perpetuate inequalities but also foster distrust in science, particularly among historically marginalized communities.
History shows that combining nationalism and eugenics can have devastating consequences. In the early 20th century, eugenics justified racial segregation in the U.S. and “racial hygiene” policies in Germany. While today’s context differs, Wojcik warns that normalizing these ideas could lead to significant setbacks in both science and society.
Lessons from the past
The past offers valuable lessons about eugenics’ dangers. In the U.S., forced sterilization was justified as a “social welfare” measure but served to further marginalize vulnerable groups. Black, Indigenous, and poor women were disproportionately affected, often without consent or knowledge. These programs, continuing into the late 20th century, left a legacy of distrust in medical institutions, especially among minority communities.
In Europe, eugenics justified exclusionary policies that culminated in tragedies like the Holocaust. The notion of a “superior race” not only dehumanized millions but also distorted science, diverting resources from legitimate research to pseudoscientific projects. The Nazi collapse exposed eugenics’ fallacy, but its ideas persisted in smaller-scale policies.
Today, the challenge is preventing these ideas from gaining new life. Globalization and the internet facilitate the spread of eugenics narratives, often disguised as concerns for public health or national security. The response, Wojcik argues, must be global, involving scientists, educators, and policymakers in a joint effort to promote scientific truth and equality.
Future of science and equality
Wojcik’s warning is a call to action for the scientific community and society at large. Eugenics, though discredited, continues to find resonance in rhetoric exploiting fear and division. Combating this threat requires more than debunking myths; it demands a positive narrative about human diversity, showing how it enriches science and society.
Genomics, for instance, has the potential to revolutionize medicine, but only if scientists embrace genetic diversity’s complexity. Projects like 1000 Genomes, analyzing genetic variability across global populations, demonstrate the value of an inclusive approach. These studies show humanity is far more interconnected than racial categories suggest, reinforcing the idea that we are, above all, one species.
Education also plays a crucial role. Teaching future generations about genetic science in an accessible, inclusive way can help disarm eugenics narratives before they spread. Schools and universities have a responsibility to foster critical thinking, showing how science can unite rather than divide.
- Priorities for the future:
- Advance genomic research with a focus on diversity.
- Promote scientific education at all levels.
- Combat the political misuse of science for discrimination.
- Ensure science is inclusive and representative.
The scientific community faces a new challenge with the resurgence of eugenics ideas promoting the false notion of genetic superiority among human groups. Genevieve L. Wojcik, an epidemiology professor at Johns Hopkins University, published an article in Nature warning about the growing influence of these pseudoscientific theories. According to the expert, the eugenics movement, which gained momentum in the late 19th century, is reemerging in political rhetoric and practices that could undermine scientific advances and the fight for a more equitable world. Eugenics, historically linked to discriminatory policies and even Nazism, advocates for “genetic improvement” of humanity through measures like encouraging reproduction among certain groups and restricting it among others deemed inferior.
Wojcik’s warning comes at a time when statements from public figures are reigniting dangerous debates. In the United States, former President Donald Trump commented on the presence of “bad genes” in the country, tying it to immigration. Such remarks echo past ideologies that justified racist and exclusionary policies. Additionally, Robert Kennedy Jr., the current Health Secretary, sparked controversy by suggesting that vaccines for Black children should differ from those for white children, based on alleged immunological differences. These ideas, Wojcik argues, lack scientific backing and reinforce myths about biological differences between races.
Science, however, is clear: there are no human races with defined biological boundaries. Genomic studies show that two humans, regardless of physical traits, share, on average, 99% of their genetic material. Phenotypic differences, such as skin or eye color, represent minimal DNA variations. This reality dismantles the foundation of eugenics, which relies on the belief in fixed and hierarchical racial categories. For Wojcik, using concepts like “race” in scientific research can even hinder medical progress by overlooking genetic diversity within population groups.
- Key points raised by Wojcik:
- Eugenics promotes pseudoscientific ideas that justify discrimination.
- Recent political statements in the U.S. reinforce racial myths.
- Genetic science debunks the existence of biologically distinct races.
- The resurgence of eugenics threatens global equality.
Dark history of eugenics
The eugenics movement is not new, but its history reveals the dangers of its application. In the late 19th century, eugenics gained popularity in countries like the United Kingdom and the United States, inspired by the ideas of Francis Galton, Charles Darwin’s cousin. Galton argued that artificial selection could “improve” the human species, much like it did with plants and animals. Initially presented as scientific, this view was soon adopted by governments and institutions to justify discriminatory policies. In the U.S., for instance, eugenics underpinned laws restricting immigration and promoting forced sterilization of those deemed “unfit.”
Between the 1900s and 1970s, the United States implemented sterilization programs that affected 60,000 to 70,000 people. In states like Virginia, these practices continued until 1979, disproportionately targeting ethnic minorities, people with disabilities, and the poor. The 1924 Immigration Act, known as the Johnson-Reed Act, was also influenced by eugenics ideas, limiting the entry of immigrants from countries deemed “undesirable.” These policies had lasting impacts, reinforcing social and racial inequalities that persist today.
Eugenics also found resonance elsewhere. In Nazi Germany, notions of racial superiority led to atrocities like the Holocaust, with the sterilization and extermination of millions. While the collapse of the Nazi regime discredited eugenics for decades, Wojcik warns that its revival in new forms, often disguised as science, poses a real threat. White nationalism, gaining traction in various countries, often relies on narratives that distort genetics to promote racial divisions.
Science versus pseudoscience
Wojcik’s critique of eugenics is grounded in robust scientific evidence. Modern genomics has revealed that genetic variability among humans is far greater than differences between supposed “races.” For example, two individuals of African descent may have genetic differences as significant as those between an African and a European. This genetic heterogeneity challenges the idea of fixed racial categories, which eugenics uses as its basis.
A practical example is research on hemoglobinopathies, genetic disorders affecting hemoglobin production. The prevalence of these conditions varies widely by region, regardless of racial categories. In India, beta-thalassemia affects over 8% of the population in certain areas, while in China, it is below 2.7%. If scientists classified all these individuals as “Asian,” they would overlook critical differences affecting diagnosis and treatment. Such generalizations, Wojcik argues, hinder precision medicine, which relies on detailed analysis of genetic diversity.
Moreover, science has debunked myths about immunological differences between racial groups. Robert Kennedy Jr.’s suggestion that Black children need different vaccines lacks support from immunological studies. Vaccines are designed to work universally on the human immune system, with adjustments only for factors like age or specific health conditions. Statements like Kennedy’s not only lack evidence but also fuel distrust in science and public health policies.
- Scientific facts debunking eugenics:
- Two human genomes are 99% identical, regardless of appearance.
- Genetic variability within an ethnic group can exceed that between groups.
- Genetic diseases vary more by region than by racial categories.
- No evidence supports significant immunological differences between races.
Social and political impacts
The resurgence of eugenics ideas extends beyond science, with profound political and social implications. In the U.S., rhetoric from figures like Trump, linking immigration to “bad genes,” reflects an attempt to legitimize exclusionary policies. These narratives gain traction in a polarized context, where white nationalism finds room to grow. Wojcik warns that without a firm response from the scientific community, these ideas risk becoming normalized, undermining decades of progress in the fight against inequality.
Globally, white nationalism is also on the rise. In Europe, far-right parties have gained strength, often promoting rhetoric that echoes past eugenics. These movements frequently misuse science, citing genetic studies out of context to justify minority exclusion. The manipulation of science for political ends is not new, but the ease of spreading information in the digital age amplifies its reach.
In Brazil, while the eugenics debate is less explicit, structural racism still reflects some of its historical consequences. Public health and education policies often overlook the specificities of Black and Indigenous populations, perpetuating inequalities. Science has a critical role in debunking these distortions, promoting evidence-based policies grounded in human genetic diversity.
Role of the scientific community
Responding to eugenics, Wojcik argues, requires active engagement from scientists. This involves not only debunking pseudoscientific theories but also educating the public about the complexity of human genetics. Scientific education is a powerful tool to combat misinformation, especially when public figures selectively use science to advance their agendas.
Scientists must also engage in public policy, ensuring genetic research promotes health and well-being for all, not division. Initiatives like the Human Genome Project, which mapped the species’ genetic diversity, exemplify how science can unite rather than divide. Additionally, universities and research institutions should promote diversity among researchers to ensure varied perspectives in scientific production.
Communication is another key aspect. Complex genetic concepts are often misunderstood by the public, creating space for eugenics narratives. Scientists need to invest in outreach strategies that make genetics accessible without oversimplifications that distort reality. Wojcik suggests universities create community extension programs, bringing scientific knowledge directly to populations most affected by misinformation.
- Actions proposed by Wojcik for scientists:
- Actively combat genetic misinformation.
- Engage in evidence-based public policies.
- Promote diversity in scientific research.
- Invest in accessible communication about genetics.
Threat of white nationalism
The rise of white nationalism is a major concern highlighted by Wojcik. This movement, gaining ground in countries like the U.S., Hungary, and Poland, often co-opts scientific concepts to justify its ideologies. Genetics, in particular, is an easy target, as the public often lacks understanding of its complexity. Statements like Trump’s about “bad genes” or Kennedy’s about differentiated vaccines exploit this confusion, creating narratives that seem scientific but fail under scrutiny.
In practice, white nationalism uses eugenics to promote policies that restrict minority rights. In the U.S., proposals to limit immigration or encourage certain groups’ birth rates reflect a modern eugenics mindset. These policies not only perpetuate inequalities but also foster distrust in science, particularly among historically marginalized communities.
History shows that combining nationalism and eugenics can have devastating consequences. In the early 20th century, eugenics justified racial segregation in the U.S. and “racial hygiene” policies in Germany. While today’s context differs, Wojcik warns that normalizing these ideas could lead to significant setbacks in both science and society.
Lessons from the past
The past offers valuable lessons about eugenics’ dangers. In the U.S., forced sterilization was justified as a “social welfare” measure but served to further marginalize vulnerable groups. Black, Indigenous, and poor women were disproportionately affected, often without consent or knowledge. These programs, continuing into the late 20th century, left a legacy of distrust in medical institutions, especially among minority communities.
In Europe, eugenics justified exclusionary policies that culminated in tragedies like the Holocaust. The notion of a “superior race” not only dehumanized millions but also distorted science, diverting resources from legitimate research to pseudoscientific projects. The Nazi collapse exposed eugenics’ fallacy, but its ideas persisted in smaller-scale policies.
Today, the challenge is preventing these ideas from gaining new life. Globalization and the internet facilitate the spread of eugenics narratives, often disguised as concerns for public health or national security. The response, Wojcik argues, must be global, involving scientists, educators, and policymakers in a joint effort to promote scientific truth and equality.
Future of science and equality
Wojcik’s warning is a call to action for the scientific community and society at large. Eugenics, though discredited, continues to find resonance in rhetoric exploiting fear and division. Combating this threat requires more than debunking myths; it demands a positive narrative about human diversity, showing how it enriches science and society.
Genomics, for instance, has the potential to revolutionize medicine, but only if scientists embrace genetic diversity’s complexity. Projects like 1000 Genomes, analyzing genetic variability across global populations, demonstrate the value of an inclusive approach. These studies show humanity is far more interconnected than racial categories suggest, reinforcing the idea that we are, above all, one species.
Education also plays a crucial role. Teaching future generations about genetic science in an accessible, inclusive way can help disarm eugenics narratives before they spread. Schools and universities have a responsibility to foster critical thinking, showing how science can unite rather than divide.
- Priorities for the future:
- Advance genomic research with a focus on diversity.
- Promote scientific education at all levels.
- Combat the political misuse of science for discrimination.
- Ensure science is inclusive and representative.
Veja Também:
Pé-de-meia para licenciatura promete bolsas de R$ 1.050 para universitários e benefícios para professores
Decisão judicial reafirma cessão definitiva de direitos autorais de Roberto e Erasmo Carlos, impactando o mercado musical brasileiro
Simone Mendes realiza lifting na testa para rejuvenescimento; especialistas explicam técnica
Victor Wembanyama suffers shoulder thrombosis and will miss the rest of the season
Isis atira em Berta e agita reta final de ‘Mania de Você’ com prisão em flagrante
Famílias do CadÚnico ganham nova antena digital grátis; veja como pedir até 30 de junho